Governance Reform Framed as Disruption

ERA VIII — Cycles of Governance Friction
Governance Practice
2006

Reform efforts were increasingly characterized as destabilizing rather than constructive.

What Happened

Boards and management often framed governance reform proposals as risks to stability, culture, or economic performance, discouraging experimentation.

Why It Matters Today

This framing persists, making modernization appear adversarial even when motivated by risk mitigation.

Related Patterns

Pattern 1: Finality Without Adaptation
Pattern 8: Procedural Legitimacy vs. Trust

Related Governance Themes

Non-Dismissive Engagement Standards
‍ Predictable mechanisms for future inclusion decisions

Sources

Primary Source
Secondary Source Link